Re: NZC standalone vs. software?

["Lee McC" <leemcc1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

- ----- Original Message -----
From: "George Rue" <snowden@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <zeppelin@xxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, November 03, 2001 10:46 AM
Subject: NZC standalone vs. software?


> To sum this all up.  PC burners make faster copies and can hold data file
> and movies and pictures.  But Stand-Alone burners are much more versatile
> when it comes to audio recording.  I've owned a Philips Stand-alone since
> March 1999.  Any type of audio source can be plugged straight into the
back
> on the "S.A." burners.    They have Analog / Digital / Optical inputs.  I
> can even plug a mic or guitar into it and make home demos on it.  It's
> really a great device.

Not trying to be argumentative but there's nothing listed there that I can't
do with my PC burner.  (Or couldn't do with the addition/upgrade of a card
or two)

I'd even go so far as to say that the PC burner is far more versatile for
audio as you can do all of the above plus store the data on your computer,
manipulate it any way you want, and then burn it.  I don't think the stand
alones allow for much editing.

:o)