Re: the object (original?)

[J & S Andelman <plantss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

there now.  still can't tell.  dammit!
thanks for the link.

On 1/4/2011 9:41 PM, Timothy Friez wrote:
> Rick Barrett has all the info you need on his website to tell if your 
> object is real or a reproduction. To bad mine is a repo.
> http://zeppelincollectables.com/pages.php?pageid=4
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "J & S Andelman" 
> <plantss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <zeppelin@xxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2011 9:17 PM
> Subject: Re: the object (original?)
>
>
> > all this talk made me dust off my object and take a peek.  the base 
> > says 217/1000, LED ZEPPELIN, PRESENCE, and the 1976 copyright.  
> > always just assumed it was a replica as I bought it back in my 
> > college days (early 90s) and can't imagine me having any real $$ to 
> > shell out.  are replicas out there with the same details?  any tell 
> > tale signs one way or the other?
> >
> > the bad news is that it's a bit chipped.  nothing too terrible but I 
> > guess I shouldn't paint the bugger either.....
> >
> > > It is copyrighted by Swan Song. It's cast into the originals on the 
> > > topside of the base.
> > >
> > > - --- On Mon, 1/3/11, TangerineMan<tangerineman@xxxxxxxxxxxx>  wrote:
> > > > >  Methinks 3D printing might be the way to go.
> > > > >  The guys and gals at www dot shapeways dot com might be
> > > > >  able to help... but they might be reticent if it is indeed a
> > > > >  copyrighted design.
> > > > >