[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: The O2: Zep or not Zep?
- Subject: Re: The O2: Zep or not Zep?
- From: TangerineMan <tangerineman@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 22 Aug 2010 11:11:46 -0400
Steve A. Jones opines:
> The reason why Robert, when all is said and done, doesn't see the
> 02 incarnation as "Led Zeppelin" is because it wasn't Led Zeppelin.
Robert Plant says, in an interview with the Telegraph published on
August 20, 2010:
"I really had a wonderful time... It [the O2] was the best Led
Zeppelin gig since 1975."
And, about Zep in its prime, he "remains hugely proud," saying: "We
were never a middle of the road band, we were really quite fearsome."
So he's vacillating between "it wasn't Led Zeppelin" (or "THE Led
Zeppelin") and "it was Led Zeppelin" (an exceedingly competent
version thereof). Big deal; nothing to see here, folks, move along,
move along... He's flip-flopped on the issue for decades now,
embracing or impugning The Legacy according to his whims--sometimes
it happens years apart (1983-85: no Zep in his live shows; 1988-1998,
plenty of Zep in his live shows; 1998-2000, no Zep; 2001-present,
plenty of Zep) and now, increasingly, within the space of a few weeks
or days ("the O2 wasn't the real LZ because it wasn't Bonzo on drums"
in one interview; "It was the best Zeppelin gig since 1975" in at
least one other).
It's called insecurity, and it's a well-known symptom of LSD (lead
singer disease).