Re: Once again...Plant says no...

[Steve Thomson <zeppelin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Eddie, I find your message offensive not only to me but to the others on 
this list who've pointed out the gross inconsistencies in Plant's 
statements. I didn't quote him from 1989 but from mid-September 2008 
when he told Q magazine he had nothing against more Zeppelin reunions it 
was just the paperwork that was a problem, and then two weeks later 
posting an announcement on his web site telling the world he has no 
intention of working with Led Zeppelin, followed by this statement three 
months later that he's in a different place right now.

Look, just as you view me and some others on the list as constant Plant 
bashers who just won't let it go, I view you as a constant Plant 
apologist who just won't see Plant for the con he really is. If you 
really find us on FBO to be as distasteful as you claim, why not go join 
the bunch of menopausal ex-groupies groaning over Plant on 
manicnirvana.com and leave us in peace.

Eddie Lombardi wrote:
> I must be reading different articles to everyone else.
>
> Plant to me has always been very clear to me.  Maybe I'm just smarter
> than everyone else or maybe I'm just as big a ass as Plant is (in the eyes
> of most people on this list it seems.)
>
> He said it was a one off he said he wasn't against more shows but only i
> f it was for something special (sorry fans have to realize you aren't that 
> special.  Don't like it go cry to your mommy) and he said doesn't want to
> be a rock star anymore.
>
> Sounds clear to me always have.
>
> Of course I'm not drudging up what he might have said in oh uh 1989 or what
> ever.  
>
> Things move on but apparently not on this list. 
>
> Eddie
>
> ----------------------------------------
>   
> > Date: Fri 26 Dec 2008 15:39:43 +0000
> > From: catharinak@xxxxxxxxxx
> > To: zeppelin@xxxxxxxx
> > Subject: Re: Re: Once again...Plant says no...
> >
> >
> > Agree on both counts. Still, it would be easier to let him have his
> > peace if he'd do us the same courtesy. :-)
> >
> > This is what comes of him riding the Led Zeppelin publicity wave
> > during 2008 leaving it nebulous for so long and as Steve points
> > out having a history of prevaricating.
> >
> > The three J's coming out with something is probably the only thing
> > that will stop the press asking Plant the question though. Heck
> > maybe not even then.
> >
> > Nice to know Page has as much class as ever remaining Plant's
> > supportive friend to the end. I need to get me a "WWJD" bracelet...
> > :-)
> >
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >
> > To dare to will to remain silent is magic...
> >
> > On Dec 25 2008 zeppelin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> >
> > Stephanie Sandlin wrote:
> >     
> > > Take him at his word. Let the man have his peace.
> > >
> > > I'm far more interested in what JP and JPJ have up their
> > >       
> > sleeve.
> >     
> > >       
> > I'm all for letting him have his peace but as for the word
> > bit--the
> > credibility--that's shot.
> >     
>
>
>
>
>
>
>