[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Myles...speaks...
- Subject: Re: Myles...speaks...
- From: TheCosmicEnergy <thecosmicenergy@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 00:14:36 -0500
Well.......to a point, I agree with Nathan on this one. I don't
know if it was any kind of REAL indicator or not, but.........his body
language and demeaner DID totally change when he answered THAT
question and for that question only. If he had been up-and-down
throughout the whole interview, I wouldn't have even thought twice
about it, but he was completely meek and mild for the rest of the
interview, even when talking about AC/DC and Guns-n-Roses' new albums.
Does it mean anything MORE than what he actually said..........who
knows. I for one though, still wouldn't mind seeing it happen.
Ramblin' On,
Cosmicº°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø
On 12/1/08, Nathan Hevensone <nhevensone@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Do you have more info beyond this interview? Because if so,
> considering your track record, I'd say it's time to hit a bar because
> I'll be depressed and need a pick-me-up (in other words, if you know
> more, then you're most likely right).
>
> However, Myles's body language and even tone of voice suggested he
> meant exactly what he said: He won't be singing for Led Zeppelin.
>
> He will, however, be singing for Page, Jones, and Bonham.
>
> Obviously, I could be wrong, but that's my interpretation.
>
> Nech, if there's something we don't know that you do, spill the
> beans... please? Pretty please? With (your favorite alcoholic drink)
> on top?
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 4:35 PM, Nech <tytlane@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > nhevensone@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> >>
> >> (caps used in place of italics to denote emphasis, NOT yelling)
> >>
> >> Oh boy... despite the fact the we KNOW that Page will not tour as LED
> >> ZEPPELIN without Robert Plant, people still take this as a downer.
> >>
> >> Myles Kennedy will NOT be singing for Led Zeppelin. That does NOT
> >> mean he won't be singing for the 3 J's. He just won't be singing for
> >> LED ZEPPELIN.
> >>
> >> I'd say we know, at this point, that there's a big difference...
> >>
> >>
> >
> > I guess you missed my previous post... not for Led Zeppelin and not for not
> > Led Zeppelin.
> >
> > I guess it just didn't work out and the chances of him doing anything
> > further with the J's are close to, if not, zero.
> >
>