[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
TSRTS Vinyl Review
- Subject: TSRTS Vinyl Review
- From: Buckeye <buckeye@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2008 16:42:17 -0400
The Song Remains the Same 180 gram Vinyl 4-LP Set Review (2008 Issue)
Sorry it took so long to get this written! This audio review is based
upon the subject review in BLACK vinyl only (no way am I playing my
white vinyl!). I visually compared the white and the black vinyl issues.
They appear to be stamped from the same stampers - the dead wax writing
is identical. I have a postal scale and I weighed each version. The
scale isn't super accurate and doesn't read in grams. The black vinyl
weighed in at 6.8 ounces (192.7 grams) and the white vinyl weighed in at
6.5 ounces (184.3 grams). If my copies are typical, a person might be
able to tell the difference between a sealed white vinyl copy versus a
sealed black vinyl copy - the white set would be about 30 grams lighter.
In my discussions with folks who have both colors of vinyl, there is NO
consistent way of telling which color you have based on observation of
the sealed packages.
Most websites and sources call this a "re-mastered" album. This usually
means that a mixed 2-channel source was "cleaned up" and re-issued.
However, since they went back to the multitrack tapes and actually
re-mixed, this should be called a "re-mixed" album. Re-mixing gives far
more control. The sticker on the front of the box set says "Remastering
supervised by Jimmy Page." I think that the statement on the back of the
box "Mixed by Kevin Shirley" makes a bigger impact to my mind (and
ears). When the album was mixed the first time (by Eddie Kramer), Kevin
was barely old enough to drive.
Let me state up front, TSRTS is my least favorite Led Zeppelin album -
but that statement is loaded! When TSRTS came out, I played it over and
over (and saw the movie about 20 times in the first month - no kidding),
but about a year later, I discovered bootlegs, and I soon enjoyed the
variety that I could have by picking different years, etc. TSRTS was
actually the only Zep vinyl album that I didn't wear out as a teenager
(at least not to the point of buying a replacement - like I have for all
the other Zep LPs). So my point is, I don't have a good reference of
what TSRTS used to sound like in my head. My old vinyl version probably
has a bunch of wear. So I won't compare them.
Very first impression: WOW, what a quiet disc! Not a sign of any tics or
pops - not one!! Side one is the most quietest album sides that I own,
hands down! Some of the other sides had a bit of tics (especially the NQ
side), but overall, a very very quiet album. Quieter than any of the the
200g QSV Zeppelin re-issues.
I really like the re-insertion of the originally missing tracks - the
continuity is much better, especially for us folks who are used to
listening to full-shows (boots), and know the setlists pretty well. I
can imagine, back in the day, the agony the band must have felt trying
to decide what songs to keep for the original 2-LP set. Realizing that
they only got about 80 minutes (~20 min per side times 4 sides) to
represent a Led Zeppelin concert - that’s not even half a show! (add to
that the fact that one of the 4 sides must be saved for D&C!). Now I can
work off my beer belly by getting up off the couch 8 times to play a
full Zep show!
The bass is *really* great sounding - very pronounced yet tight, in part
due to the half-speed mastering, no doubt. The bass on the first side of
D&C is sooo tight! (yes D&C takes up more than one side!). The overall
sound is very well balanced, in fact, possibly too well balanced and
perfect for a live show. Every decibel seems to be in place. I would
have liked a rawer, looser sound to it all. It might be just my lack of
remembering the original issue, but this version seems to have Page
turned down just a tad. I originally thought that, but then I'll change
that statement to perhaps Jones and Bonham are a little more turned up.
But not for the bad - don't get me wrong! The balance and sound is so
good, that you can very easily concentrate on one member versus another.
My memory is that the original mix was more of the "70's Rock & Roll
Guitar Band" sound.
But now we get to my pet peeve: Oh why oh why did they have to convert
to the digital domain??????? I know the answers: total control and
manipulation down to the millisecond, lower noise, no generation loss,
automation, dynamic range, etc etc. But don't they know that most of the
folks that are going to play this 180 gram vinyl are folks with great
equipment and educated ears? I mean, just think of it this way: You
start in analog, you convert to digital, then you convert back to
analog, just to stick it back on an LP? Analog is where it's at baby,
why did you have to digitize? I could hear within a couple of minutes of
my first needle drop - that digital "sterile" sound, though certainly
this album is warmer and not as strident as a CD. For people that don't
know what I'm talking about here (and/or think I'm nuts), its very hard
to explain. There are just certain aspects of analog that sound better
than digital (and the opposite can be said, as well). There is a very
subtle "digital" sound that can be heard. Don't get me wrong - I'm not
one of those snob analog purists, I like both. There is definitely a
place for CDs. But for me, reverting back to a great sounding album is
like sipping brandy by the fire with my love. Its warm, and it's sound
stage forms a mood. When I listen hard to a CD, I can't get to that
place. Okay.....I digress.......
As expected, Kevin Shirley and Jimmy Page did a fantastic job. You guys
couldn't have done a better job (except for my digital nit-pick). The
sound is massive and perfect. The thing about Zep is that they NEVER get
old - it was great as a teenager, and it's just as great now. I can't
wait for the vinyl version of Mothership! I'm told that there IS some
stuff on there that doesn't have analog in the chain! I will have fun
trying to pick out the AAA versus the ADA!
Bruce Deerhake
August 15, 2008