RE: Bootleg Vinyl

["sLoObY" <slooby@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I'm all for the digital photo process, but the two scans/photoshop method is
good for the competent out there.

Les. :) 

-----Original Message-----
From: owners-zeppelin@xxxxxxxx [mailto:owners-zeppelin@xxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of tytlane@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Saturday, 11 November 2006 12:07 AM
To: randy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: zeppelin@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Bootleg Vinyl

I would venture that the scanner is the biggest culprit in acquiring the
vinyl art. Of course though 2 scans and properly aligning them via photoshop
is relative easy. Now that digital cameras are up and over 10 megapixels a
good cropped pic would do the trip as well no ?

Nech

randy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

> On a related vinyl subject, over the years I've received various emails
about vinyl art.   My response has always been that I don't post vinyl art
because I don't have any to post.  I can only assume that no one submits
vinyl scans because of (a) CD and downloading proliferation and (b) it takes
a large scanner or stitching software.  
> 
> So I'll throw this out to the group:  I'm willing to create a vinyl
artwork section on ZeppelinArt if some of you industrious vinyl collectors
want to submit scans.    I think high res vinyl scans would be a great
addition to the web site and the cover art legacy of the band.  But that's
just my AR completist side talking.  LOL!  
> 
> Randy
> www.zeppelinart.com
> 
> 
>