[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Page nails us!!!
- Subject: Page nails us!!!
- From: Nech <tytlane@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2005 15:03:47 -0400
While reading through the ZigZag articles sent to me by our most
gracious Freda ( THANK YOUUUU!!!!!!! ) I came across a friggin great
quote that made me want to run and hide my head in the sand for
awhile.... check it out and see what I mean...
ZZ: ...from your own experience you must realize that most "rock
critics" haven't got a clue what they're talking about.
JP. Well I began to wonder. On our last American tour, this guy came up
and got talking to me;he said he was from Rock, which is quite an
eminent, respected magazine in the States isn't it? He asked me things
like " Does Plant still gyrate about on stage?" and I said "well if it's
a fast number he does move about,yes, but it depends what we're playing"
- and his conversation went on at that sort of level until, bit by bit
from the sort of questions he was asking, it became evident that he
didn't really know what he was on about. So I asked him exactly when
he'd last seen the band;"quite awhile ago now" he mumbled, and when I
questioned him a bit more it transpired that the only time he'd seen us
was in 'Supershow' which was a film made a couple of months after we'd
formed. ....slight snip...So here was a respected critic, who had done
reviews of our albums, and he didn't even know the first thing about
us...didn't even know that we played acoustic numbers on stage. I'd been
nice to him all along, but at that point I really let him have it.
ZZ: You punched the creep's teeth down his throat ?
JP: No, I just told him that I thought it was really cheek for him to do
reviews of the band if he was basing his misconceptions on that film
clip. But it's the sort of thing we used to get...the public was always
100% behind us, but we had few allies in the press.
ZZ: So many big rock stars seem extremely vulnerable to press opinion
and yet most critics have lamentably little knowledge of their subject -
but I've seen Hendrix's death, the breakup of Cream and all sorts of
things attributed directly to the printed word.
JP: Yes, but the thing is these reviewers are so authoritative. We know
they might be twits, but the readers believe them because of the
eloquent, authoritative way they write. It's so easy to criticise
someone's music, but when you think how much thought and care and time
it's taken, why not look for the good points at least...I mean, if it's
not your taste in music, then leave it well alone and let someone else
do the reviews. For instance, when you ask me my opinion of certain
groups, I'll tell you, but I don't want you to be influenced or jaded by
what I say, because someone else may hold the exact opposite view which
is obviously just as valid.
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZziiiiiinnnnnggggGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG!!!!!!!!!!!!
I've been reamed. Thank God I am far from being an eloquent writer. And
will always be the first to admit I am in no way authoratative. I'm a
twit. or tw_t...opinions vary!
BTW, these old ZigZag articles are a fabulous read. Again most high
thanks to Freda for being such a dear and making me copies. I owe you
one...Eddie buy her a tepid pint or 12 for me!!
Nech
--