IN MY, YOUR, HIS, HER, OURS, THEIR OPINION

[Weiser <weiser@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Unless you were there taping a show, first hand you don't really know what
you have in hand.
Your recording may sound similar to Led Zeppelin in style and genre.
I suggest you review any and all unverifiable source audio recordings that
you didn't originally make yourself
 to correct what is probably mislabeling:
Example:
P. O.(Personal Opnion)
Sounds similar to Led Zeppelin style and genre
Live performance Unidentified musicians
may be 9-14-71
may be near Hampton Roads

If a piece is represented as Led Zeppelin IN FACT of the matter then there
is a problem.
In my opinion we don't know for sure who performed, where they performed or
when they performed. When a person labels a recording as Led Zeppelin, they
are 
representing something as a fact. The only people that are licensed to
label a recording as Led Zeppelin as a matter of the fact of a studio
release etc. are people who have licensed, contracted material that can be
verified. Any other audio recordings of live performances that sound
similar to Led Zeppelin but that can't be verified by the owner of the
recording should be relabeled.
Why because I believe you really DO NOT KNOW FOR A FACT THAT THE AMATEUR
RECORDINGS YOU HAVE ARE THE MUSIC OF ATALANTIC RECORDS RECORDING ARTISTS
LED ZEPPELIN. Are your recordings counterfeits?
No, I believe your recordings may be music by unknown unidentified
musicians whose music
sounds similar to the Led Zeppelin style and genre of music.
In my opinion one ought to think about putting what is likely more accurate
info on one's CD labels, etc. and er stamp it.
In my opinion ears alone are not enough.
Shar