[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Pink Floyd's The Division Bell (was: Aerosmith)
- Subject: Re: Pink Floyd's The Division Bell (was: Aerosmith)
- From: "James Bigelow" <zolcaro@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 00:41:09 -0700
I have to disagree on The Division Bell being the most boring as hell
album
by the Floyd. If you want a boring one, play Ummagumma. disc 2, the
studio
part of the album. Now that is boring! Or, play Atom Heart Mother,
that's
also boring! But TDB, please...! Either way, I enjoy all of the
Floyd's
work. I also enjoy almost all of Aerosmith's work. One album I can't
stand, though, is Night In The Ruts (aka Right In The Nuts), the only
good
song being No Surprize. I didn't like Aerosmith's cover of Page's
Think
About It at all! They butchered that song. Just my 2c.
James
> At 01:14 AM 6/14/01 -0400, you wrote:
> >I'll add to this list every bout of musical explosive diarreoha
> >Rush
> >(post "Grace Under Pressure"), The Rolling Stones (post the
> >questionable
> >"Tattoo You") and Metallica (post "And Justice For All") released.
> >While
> >"A Momentary Lapse Of Reason" isn't bad, the so-called Pink Floyd
> >makes
> >the list for "The Division Bell", a fucking boring record. And U2
> >makes
> >my list for everything after "The Joshua Tree". REM gets an
> >honourable
> >mention for the feast of suck they've been post "Document".
> >
>
> Besides your assessment of Aerosmith, you sir are fucking insane.
> Rush's
> album "Test for Echo" is /better/ than "Grace Under Pressure"
> (which is
> pretty clinical and boring). I still like the Black Album by
> Metallica,
> though everything after is pretty bad. I like "The Division Bell."
> I'd
> agree with U2, but REM was great until "Monster."
>
> Perry