[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Second Best? (SZC)Rolling Stones?
- Subject: Re: Second Best? (SZC)Rolling Stones?
- From: Weiser <weiser@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 07:40:29 -0400
Dear J.R.
Yep, you're right, then everybody was more atune to heart pounding rhythms
that made your blood sing in your ears.
I would have countered the rock percussion with a touch more of what went
on with the acoustical set when I thought I remembered Bonzo sitting along
the front of the stage with the others with what was it bongos for '77?
The entire signature of Zep was quintessential to the total popularity impact.
But, there's no reason why bits and pieces of that other percussion
direction couldn't surface again in certain arrangements.
I'd settle for some kettle drums and kitchen pots and pans if they sounded
good, whatever it takes to make it work,
Noting here that I've heard naught of Robert and SS.
the drum loops Id have to say the same thing, where'd that all go?
Shar
At 11:32 PM 8/28/01 -0400, JR Sroufe wrote:
snip
>
>
>Whatever became of that dude in France that Jimma was getting
>those drum loop samples from back in '94?
>
>I liked the drum rhythm stuff from the P/P tours and I find 'Most
>High' the Most Tolerable of all the tracks on 'Wanking Into
>Turdsdale', but if they'd have put out this type of stuff in the
>Zeppelin days, we wouldn't be here on a LZ mailing list now.
>Because they wouldn't have sold *near* the records they did. Fact
>is, Led Zeppelin was a *rock and roll* band.
snip
>JR