Re: a thought here and half a thought there and two thirds of a

[jacqueb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]

Rob O'Reilly wrote:

> It's hard to
> reconcile the continuing popularity of bands which are 25-35 years old
> (and in some cases don't even exist anymore) with your assertion that "any
> music over a couple of years old [gets] proclaimed dinosaur."

I think Shar meant "critically acclaimed" to be dinosaur. You know how
some critics are just after the next sweet thing around the block.
Last month's "flavour of the week" will be *out* and in a big way.

Shar:
> > A good night or bad, there was
> > always an element of magic that Nobody Else ever came close to.

Rob: 
> "Magic" is not a word I associate with shows like 4/27/77 or 8/11/79 or
> 7/7/80; "uninspired," "sloppy," and "dismal" seem more appropriate to me.

4/27/77???

Them's fighting words! THE DESTROYER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
The Destroyer is always good for an hours worth of tingles.
:)

Love,
Theolyn