[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Peter Grant: Shrewd businessman or Fathead?
- Subject: Peter Grant: Shrewd businessman or Fathead?
- From: Scott Swanson <swandwn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 11 Nov 1997 23:03:26 -0800 (PST)
McCue writes:
>10. Wait, one more thing! I've read commentary that describes Peter Grant
>as a shrewd businessman and a critical member of the Zep team. I couldn't
>disagree more. I'm sure the guys were far richer financially for his
>efforts, but look at the price they eventually paid. Two members of the
>band wound up as junkies, one dead. The singer lost his voice. (I think
>Plant was a victim of Grant's "the show must go on" mentality. Many of
>the gigs in 73 and 75 should have been re-scheduled.) He also comes off
>like a fathead in the Song Remains the Same, crying about a bunch of
>pathetic posters. Discuss...
I agree. Peter Grant did a LOT of good for the band, but some of his
tactics have had adverse effects in the long run. Example: he kept the
band in an almost-total video blackout, apparently thinking it would
create a "mystique" (and increase ticket sales). And what was the result?
Precious little official footage of the band. Other big-name groups boast
of *hundreds* of hours of visual footage, but the amount of official Zep
video can fit onto a single videotape.
Later,
Scott
(swandwn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)