Anybody seen my baby?

[jacqueb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]

Bruno wrote:

> Well I think if you're a musician you can surely appreciate the technique,
> but I think LZ was an *emotional* band, not a pure technical one.

Oh, amen to that! [And I don't mean this in a "religious" sense ;) ;)
;).]
 
> You see, Rock is inside you, nobody can teach you how to play, and
> especially how to write Rock songs, and many times technique is not so
> important (See the Rolling Stones --Okay, okay, Keith Richard is a great
> rhythm guitarist, blah, blah, blah :)), you know, you only need a "big,
> *big* heart".

:) Keef Riffhard? My boyfriend once said that Keef was a really
underrated
guitarist because he manages to find the *right* little riff or chord to
accent each song, but he still isn't obvious--he's no "showboat".
He doesn't stand out, imho, like a Page and is no way
a *technical* player (neither is Page). I've grown to love and really
appreciate Keith and would put him in the "big heart" category, for
sure.

Anyone notice any "guitar and harm." similarities in the new Stones
release
"Bridges to Babylon" and Zep? ;)

> So I definitely think you don't need to be a musician to feel music. On the
> contrary, I know many musicians that like music *only* when there are big
> techique numbers inside, and this is mortally wrong, IMO.


Brunello :) Do you mean "morally" or "mortally" ;)? Lol!

Love,
Theolyn
PS. I hope that the upcoming (and coming and coming ;)) P/P release
will have as much juice as the Stones' latest offering. Perhaps they
are tweaking it and reworking it so that it'll be just as good or 
better?! After this kinda wait it better not be lackluster ;).