RE: Question of the Day #1 (Little Roberts)

[Scott Flaherty <zoso@xxxxxxx>]

Jean Lorrah writes: (in reference to the subject of the group's possible
progeny)

No one knows.  Most women willing to fall into bed with a stranger, no
matter how glamorous he might be, are unlikely to be otherwise celibate.
Hence, two things:  first, in the 70's virtually every sexually active
young
woman was on the Pill, so there were fewer chances for "accidents" (at
least
of that nature--recall Robert's quip about his immunity to penicillin);
and
second, it's doubtful that such a woman could be certain that a child
was
Robert's rather than another partner's.

Jean, please spare us the presumptuous posts. Your statemnts are nothing
but conjecture. As one who has experienced the sexual revolution of the
1960s and 1970s, I have a slightly different take on the era. Certainly,
these women were responsible for their actions, promiscuity is not
synonymous with irresponsibility. Gimme a break-PLEASE!!!
						--An Aging Hippie